Censorship

With all the censorship in social media, and left-wing government representatives calling for “editorializing” social media posts, folks are now thinking it will eventually bleed off into email correspondence.

I mean let’s face it – social media platforms (such as X, Facebook, Instagram, and others) were originally meant to be nothing more than a passive conduit for you to chat with friends and meet new people. Now all conversations are carefully monitored, scrutinized, censored, and tracked. Not only is this intended to re-target you for advertising, but to remove anything politically incorrect. All your “friends” have to do is block you, but the government doesn’t think that’s enough. They have declared several times they want social media content editorialized, and tracked (recorded). So, why would email be different?

Let’s not forget business correspondence, and financial documents. You may be sending critical information for business through your email, with attachments that if they end up in the wrong hands could have huge consequences. Consider the amount of identity theft, and credit fraud, happening today. All it takes is one person intercepting your email.

Using private email providers instead of more popular providers from big tech companies is critical for those who prioritize privacy and data security. Using your ISP email platform may be private, but rarely is that the case. Private providers typically offer enhanced security features, including encryption, which ensures that only the sender and recipient can read the contents of an email.

Unlike major tech providers, which may scan emails for data to tailor advertisements or share information with third parties, private email services often have strict policies against data mining and sharing.

Going with a private email platform could be extremely important in an era of increasing digital surveillance, monitoring, and recording, providing users with peace of mind and protecting sensitive communications from prying eyes. Email is already programmatically tracked, and it’s only a matter of time until it’s being censored as well.

Here are our Top 5 Picks for Private Email Providers where privacy is a priority!

Proton Mail

ProtonMail is considered by most as the top choice. Proton is famous for its robust privacy features, offering end-to-end encryption ensuring only the sender and the recipient can read the contents of emails.

Based in Switzerland, it benefits from some of the world’s strictest privacy laws, further safeguarding user data. ProtonMail does not log personally identifiable information at the time of registration, allowing for anonymous account setup. The service also stands out for its user-friendly interface and compatibility with other email providers while maintaining high security standards.

ProtonMail’s commitment to not tracking or profiling its users makes it a preferred choice for those seeking a secure and private email solution.

Tuta

Tuta is a secure email service that emphasizes privacy and security for its users. It’s known for its end-to-end encryption, which ensures that only the sender and the recipient can access the contents of an email, protecting it from third parties, including Tuta itself. This encryption extends to email contacts and calendar entries as well.

One of the key features of Tuta is its adherence to strict privacy laws, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union. This compliance ensures a high level of data protection and privacy for users, particularly beneficial for those concerned about government surveillance or data mining by corporations.

Tuta also offers a free version, making encrypted email accessible to everyone, and has paid versions with additional features like expanded storage and custom domain support.

However, there are some limitations to Tuta. Its focus on security can lead to less convenience compared to more mainstream email services. Features like third-party email client support and the ability to import emails from other services are limited or non-existent. The encryption also means that certain functionalities, like searching the text of emails, are more restricted than in non-encrypted email services.

Mailfence

Mailfence is a secure and private email service that champions data protection and user privacy. Unlike mainstream email providers, it doesn’t track user activity or display ads. Its robust end-to-end encryption ensures that only the sender and recipient can read the contents of an email, safeguarding sensitive information from unauthorized access. 

Mailfence also supports digital signatures, adding an extra layer of authenticity and integrity to communications. Its integrated suite of features includes calendar, contacts, and document storage, facilitating seamless collaboration. Additionally, Mailfence operates under strict Belgian privacy laws, offering users further assurance that their data remains protected from undue surveillance.

Runbox

Runbox is a robust email service known for its strong commitment to privacy and security. Based in Norway, it benefits from strict Norwegian privacy laws, making it a secure choice for users concerned about data protection. 

Runbox offers full end-to-end encryption, ensuring that emails remain private and secure from interception. It supports IMAP, POP, and SMTP, making it highly compatible with various email clients and devices, which enhances user flexibility. 

Additionally, Runbox has a strong focus on sustainability, running its servers on renewable energy sources. It also offers a range of features including web hosting and domain registration, making it a comprehensive solution for personal and business communication needs.

Mailbox.org

Mailbox.org is a secure email service based in Germany, known for its strong commitment to privacy and security.

Leveraging Germany’s stringent data protection laws, it offers comprehensive encryption for both email and data storage, ensuring user information remains confidential. Mailbox.org allows users to send encrypted emails easily, even to recipients who do not use encryption, enhancing communication security across platforms. The service includes an array of features such as calendar, address book, and cloud storage, all encrypted for additional security.

Furthermore, Mailbox.org is committed to sustainability, running on eco-friendly energy sources. Its ad-free interface provides a clean user experience, focusing purely on functionality and user privacy.

Private Email Alternative: Prevail

With PreVeil, you get free end-to-end encrypted secure cloud storage along with secure email that’s extremely easy to use, all while keeping your existing email address. Prevail integrates with existing email accounts like Gmail or Outlook to encrypt emails without requiring a new address. It’s common use is protecting sensitive information in business communications by encrypting emails with high security standards. 

PreVeil is not considered a good option for disposable email addresses; it’s primarily designed as a secure email encryption service, allowing users to send and receive encrypted emails using their existing email addresses, making it more focused on privacy and data security than creating temporary, disposable addresses. 

PreVeil offers native applications for Windows and macOS at no cost, as well as free apps for Android and iOS. Your PreVeil account also includes 5GB of online storage for your most important files, storage that’s secure, encrypted, and flexibly shareable.

It does need to be said that folks working for fortune 100 corporations usually have an in-house security plan that makes it unnecessary to seek out private email providers. However, for the rest of us this could be of paramount importance. All it takes is once.

Hope this helps.

The White House is caught red-handed in a scandal about its influence on, and collusion with, some of the biggest social media platforms. They have worked together with Twitter and others to shape public opinion, and what we think is influencing the outcome of the election. White House Press Secretary Karine Pierre responds to a question about being forced to hand over Big Tech collusion communications. They are so busted.

TheHill.com – BY JONATHAN TURLEY, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/05/22 10:00 AM EST

Beware of politicians bearing reforms. Since the Trojans first wheeled a wooden horse into their fortified city, many are leery about “gifts” that may be heavily laden with dangers. That is true with the Trojan horse legislation just offered by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.). In the name of “reforming” the internet and bringing tech monopolies to heel, Klobuchar has penned a “Nudge Act” that would expand corporate censorship and speech controls. 

Felt compelled to insert itself.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a “Notice of Intervention” in the Trump v. Twitter lawsuit. Trump filed a lawsuit against the social media platform for permanently banning him following the January 6 riot at the US Capitol.

The DOJ’s intervention is in the defense of Section 230, a piece of legislation that protects online platforms from liability from content posted by users. The DOJ wants to point out the constitutionality of the legislation.

In this case, the DOJ is getting involved because the case questions the protection afforded to social media companies under Section 230.

“Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5.1(c) and 24(a)(1), and in accordance with the authorization of the Acting Solicitor General of the United States, the United States hereby intervenes in this action for the limited purpose of defending the constitutionality of Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (“CDA”) (Pub. L. No. 104-104, § 509, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)),” the notice states.

Although the DOJ insists it is only getting involved for “the limited purpose of defending the constitutionality of Section 230,” by doing so, it is indirectly defending Twitter.

The notice adds: “The United States is entitled to intervene in this action under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by statute. Rule 5.1(c) permits the Attorney General to intervene in an action where, as here, the constitutionality of a federal statute is challenged. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1(c). Rule 24 further permits a non-party to intervene when the non-party ‘is given an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute.’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(1).

“The United States has an unconditional statutory right to intervene ‘[i]n any action…wherein the constitutionality of any Act of Congress affecting the public interest is drawn in question[.]’ 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a). In such an action, ‘the court…shall permit the United States to intervene…for argument on the question of constitutionality.’ Id. Here, Plaintiffs have ‘drawn in question’ the constitutionality of 47 U.S.C. § 230(c), and the United States has an unconditional right to intervene to defend the statute.”

The DOJ requested the court to “set the deadline for the United States to submit its memorandum in defense of 47 U.S.C. § 230(c) as December 9, 2021.”

Taken from Reclaimthenet.org 11/22/2021
If you’re tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Censorship commitments.

More calls for censorship from the Federal Government.

They got what they wanted.

By Tom Parker – Reclaimthenet.org – Dec 10, 2020

This time the censorship is so obvious and unabashed censorship we had to share.

In one of its most flagrant election-related censorship moves to date, YouTube has announced that from today, it will start removing any videos alleging that “widespread fraud, errors, or glitches changed the outcome of any past US presidential election.”

Free speech focused platforms are growing at record rates but Trump continues to rely on the Big Tech platforms that censor his speech.

Facebook’s censorship reaches new heights as it tries to suppress accusations of election fraud.